#102878: "No color won, the game should have been a complete draw, but it still went to normal tie breakers"
Vad handlar denna rapport om?
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne
Om detta stämmer, RÖSTA på denna rapport. Rapporterna med flest röster har PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljerad beskrivning
-
• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
End game.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5
-
• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5
-
• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
End game.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5
-
• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
End game.
-
• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5
-
• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
End game.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5
-
• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5
Rapporthistorik
boardgamegeek.com/thread/3002700/question-no-one-wins-and-losing-faction
And here is where she says all these rule clarifications are correct
boardgamegeek.com/filepage/252122/turncoats-rules-end-game-clarifications
Which includes this clarification:
2. WINNING FACTION
The Faction that rules the most areas wins.
If tied, the tied faction with the most stone on the axe wins.
If still tied, the still tied faction with the most stone on the flag wins.
If still tied, there is no winning faction and there is no winning player.
This game ended the same way, it shouldn't be that easy to force a win, just end the game on a color tie with less stones?
boardgamegeek.com/thread/3161778/all-factions-lose-no-player-wins-or-least-stones-w/page/1
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Lägg till något till denna rapport
- Ett annat spelbords-ID / drag-ID
- Löste F5 problemet?
- Uppträdde problemet flera gånger? Varje gång? Slumpmässigt?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
