• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?

• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?