#117062: "Ganymede Colony now prompts player to choose only valid spot on board—why?"
Vad handlar denna rapport om?
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne
Om detta stämmer, RÖSTA på denna rapport. Rapporterna med flest röster har PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljerad beskrivning
-
• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
On previous tables, when I'd played Ganymede Colony, I'm pretty sure that I remember that the interface would just put the tile in the sole reserved spot for that card's tile.
Now, however, I see the following in the action bar:
"You must select a location to place a city, cannot place adjacent to another city [Ganymede Colony] [Show on Map] "
Prompting the player to validate the only legal spot on the board—which will always be available and never be blocked—seems to be a waste of players' time and a regression of the implementation. -
• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
On previous tables, when I'd played Ganymede Colony, I'm pretty sure that I remember that the interface would just put the tile in the sole reserved spot for that card's tile.
Now, however, I see the following in the action bar:
"You must select a location to place a city, cannot place adjacent to another city [Ganymede Colony] [Show on Map] "
Prompting the player to validate the only legal spot on the board—which will always be available and never be blocked—seems to be a waste of players' time and a regression of the implementation. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
On previous tables, when I'd played Ganymede Colony, I'm pretty sure that I remember that the interface would just put the tile in the sole reserved spot for that card's tile.
Now, however, I see the following in the action bar:
"You must select a location to place a city, cannot place adjacent to another city [Ganymede Colony] [Show on Map] "
Prompting the player to validate the only legal spot on the board—which will always be available and never be blocked—seems to be a waste of players' time and a regression of the implementation. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
On previous tables, when I'd played Ganymede Colony, I'm pretty sure that I remember that the interface would just put the tile in the sole reserved spot for that card's tile.
Now, however, I see the following in the action bar:
"You must select a location to place a city, cannot place adjacent to another city [Ganymede Colony] [Show on Map] "
Prompting the player to validate the only legal spot on the board—which will always be available and never be blocked—seems to be a waste of players' time and a regression of the implementation. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
On previous tables, when I'd played Ganymede Colony, I'm pretty sure that I remember that the interface would just put the tile in the sole reserved spot for that card's tile.
Now, however, I see the following in the action bar:
"You must select a location to place a city, cannot place adjacent to another city [Ganymede Colony] [Show on Map] "
Prompting the player to validate the only legal spot on the board—which will always be available and never be blocked—seems to be a waste of players' time and a regression of the implementation. -
• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
On previous tables, when I'd played Ganymede Colony, I'm pretty sure that I remember that the interface would just put the tile in the sole reserved spot for that card's tile.
Now, however, I see the following in the action bar:
"You must select a location to place a city, cannot place adjacent to another city [Ganymede Colony] [Show on Map] "
Prompting the player to validate the only legal spot on the board—which will always be available and never be blocked—seems to be a waste of players' time and a regression of the implementation. -
• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
-
• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v96
-
• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
On previous tables, when I'd played Ganymede Colony, I'm pretty sure that I remember that the interface would just put the tile in the sole reserved spot for that card's tile.
Now, however, I see the following in the action bar:
"You must select a location to place a city, cannot place adjacent to another city [Ganymede Colony] [Show on Map] "
Prompting the player to validate the only legal spot on the board—which will always be available and never be blocked—seems to be a waste of players' time and a regression of the implementation. -
• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
On previous tables, when I'd played Ganymede Colony, I'm pretty sure that I remember that the interface would just put the tile in the sole reserved spot for that card's tile.
Now, however, I see the following in the action bar:
"You must select a location to place a city, cannot place adjacent to another city [Ganymede Colony] [Show on Map] "
Prompting the player to validate the only legal spot on the board—which will always be available and never be blocked—seems to be a waste of players' time and a regression of the implementation. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
On previous tables, when I'd played Ganymede Colony, I'm pretty sure that I remember that the interface would just put the tile in the sole reserved spot for that card's tile.
Now, however, I see the following in the action bar:
"You must select a location to place a city, cannot place adjacent to another city [Ganymede Colony] [Show on Map] "
Prompting the player to validate the only legal spot on the board—which will always be available and never be blocked—seems to be a waste of players' time and a regression of the implementation. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
On previous tables, when I'd played Ganymede Colony, I'm pretty sure that I remember that the interface would just put the tile in the sole reserved spot for that card's tile.
Now, however, I see the following in the action bar:
"You must select a location to place a city, cannot place adjacent to another city [Ganymede Colony] [Show on Map] "
Prompting the player to validate the only legal spot on the board—which will always be available and never be blocked—seems to be a waste of players' time and a regression of the implementation. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v96
Rapporthistorik
Personally I hate hitting "Whatever" when there are a bunch of choices that order doesn't matter. Gain one ore, 3 MC and give 2 plants to someone else. Order will never matter so I'd prefer it just to happen, but I understand why the developer doesn't want to try and figure out when it matters and when it doesn't.
I honestly would rather have ALL those multi-actions automatically applied and then report the tiny minority of cases where exceptions are needed. The order of the Prelude cards is actually the only one I can think of. After hundreds of games, I literally can't think of a single instance where the order of the card effects mattered. There isn't a player window for other actions in between recieving any of them. I also play this game on a dedicated app for it where the card effect order is all automatic, and it hasn't ever made a bit of difference.
Lägg till något till denna rapport
- Ett annat spelbords-ID / drag-ID
- Löste F5 problemet?
- Uppträdde problemet flera gånger? Varje gång? Slumpmässigt?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
