#117725: "The new (as of Mach 16) display of cards is IMHO not as good as the old one."
Vad handlar denna rapport om?
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne
Om detta stämmer, RÖSTA på denna rapport. Rapporterna med flest röster har PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljerad beskrivning
-
• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
-
• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v109
-
• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v109
Rapporthistorik
There was a deployment bug some hours ago which has been fixed, does the problem still persist now ?
I just finished a game (about midnight on the 17th, Central time) ; same behavior was present.
Note that this is not fatal; I can select the "synthetic" display mode and that does not seem to crowd out its neighbors.
If I switch into mobile view, they show up: i.imgur.com/xbTRG61.png
Also if I scroll down to my opponent's screen you can see that they're stacked like this guy was saying:
i.imgur.com/1CZjWju.png
It looks fine in Firefox on windows: 124.0.1 (64-bit)
I'm having this graphical issue in Linux: 115.9.1esr-1~deb12u1
Two solutions I've found are:
- Style bot and manually tweak the width to match what it needs to be
- Switch to Synthetic. It seems that it properly expands when in "synthetic" mode. Also the expansion isn't quite as necessary in this mode.
Lägg till något till denna rapport
- Ett annat spelbords-ID / drag-ID
- Löste F5 problemet?
- Uppträdde problemet flera gånger? Varje gång? Slumpmässigt?
- Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här.
){kind=link}
