• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?

• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?