#133510: "The opponent intentionally did not counted a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed."
Vad handlar denna rapport om?
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne
Om detta stämmer, RÖSTA på denna rapport. Rapporterna med flest röster har PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljerad beskrivning
-
• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
-
• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v127
-
• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v127
Rapporthistorik
Because of my first experience with this, I managed to save my game in this way:
My opponent & I passed. My opponent refused to mark the dead stones. When the question came, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?", I naturally answered, "yes". I kept playing and killed enough groups to make the game clearly won, and when we both passed, there was no re-counting of dead stones.
Sure enough, my opponent had selected "no", as I suspected he would.
This clearly promotes cheating. The proposed solutions are as follows, going from best to worst:
1) An algorithm that automatically designates dead stones.
2) NO QUESTION about having another stage for designating stones. Since there was already one stage, but the players COULDN'T AGREE, that means that there AUTOMATICALLY needs to be another round of dead stone designation. This should just happen every time.
3) If the question remains like it does now, it should be that if EITHER or BOTH of the players answers "yes", then there should be a stone counting stage.
Lägg till något till denna rapport
- Ett annat spelbords-ID / drag-ID
- Löste F5 problemet?
- Uppträdde problemet flera gånger? Varje gång? Slumpmässigt?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
