#142674: "Path score chopped when half a path width covered by a card (not a diagonal situation this time)"
Vad handlar denna rapport om?
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne
Om detta stämmer, RÖSTA på denna rapport. Rapporterna med flest röster har PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljerad beskrivning
-
• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. -
• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
34
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. -
• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
34
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. -
• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
34
-
• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v128
-
• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. -
• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
34
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här.
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v128
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.
imgur.com/a/FDooCWf
While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.
Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.
There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v128
Rapporthistorik
Lägg till något till denna rapport
- Ett annat spelbords-ID / drag-ID
- Löste F5 problemet?
- Uppträdde problemet flera gånger? Varje gång? Slumpmässigt?
- Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här.
