• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?