#14594: "Allow for one hand victory condition."
Vad handlar denna rapport om?
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne
Om detta stämmer, RÖSTA på denna rapport. Rapporterna med flest röster har PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljerad beskrivning
-
• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).
-
• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v80
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v80
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v80
-
• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v80
-
• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).
-
• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v80
-
• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).
-
• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
-
• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v80
-
• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).
-
• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v80
-
• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v80
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v80
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Currently the available victory conditions are either 2 hands or the points system. I think offering 1 hand as an option would be good because it would make for a MUCH shorter game (and the game length would be lower variance). For example, I just played a 4-player 2-hands game which took 4 hands total, i.e. 2 hours. If we'd been unlucky, it could have been 5 hands (2.5 hours); it also could have been over in 2 hands (1 hour). This is both longer than I wanted to play, and also way higher variance (even if I'm ok with 1-2 hours, the *potential* of a 2.5hr game may prevent me from ever playing again even if it doesn't happen often).
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v80
Rapporthistorik
A single hand option is a good idea.
Lägg till något till denna rapport
- Ett annat spelbords-ID / drag-ID
- Löste F5 problemet?
- Uppträdde problemet flera gånger? Varje gång? Slumpmässigt?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
