• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

It's not possible to attack without using the extra steps

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

attack without using any of the additional red steps

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

It should be possible to attack without using the red/additional steps. When it comes to movement and the amount of steps you have to take, the rules only mention a minimum movement of 1 if possible, the movement capacity based on the section, and the possibility of moving 3 additional steps when attacking.

This is relevant because attacking breaks a train and prevents the following rider to use the wheel/relay strategy, and there are some specific situations where it might also be better to take fewer steps than possible (blocking, refueling).

• Vad har du för webbläsare?