• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?

• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

Playing a game, I tapped a side pile then realised o had a card on hand I could still play, I went to tap that card and instead of changing the focus to my newly tapped card, itoved that card into my side pile.

I don't believe this makes sense as a sequence, the sequence should always go: Tap Card > Tap spot card moves to. If the card in focus cannot be played where your 2nd tap is, focus should simply move to the new card you have tapped rather than reverse engineer where the card goes (i.e. in this instance the logic would have been Tap pile to place card on > Tap card you want added to that pile)

This is unexpected behaviour and can result in ending turns early given the rejected suggestions of being able to undo your final discard/not inventing a "confirm turn" final button.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?