#169328: "Adela effects resolved in the wrong order"
Vad handlar denna rapport om?
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne
Om detta stämmer, RÖSTA på denna rapport. Rapporterna med flest röster har PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljerad beskrivning
-
• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
does not matter
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
does not matter
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
does not matter
-
• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
does not matter
-
• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
does not matter
-
• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
-
• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
does not matter
-
• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. -
• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
approximately move 19 (maybe 18 or 20).
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
does not matter
-
• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
does not matter
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
does not matter
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I cannot imagine this is the way "Adela" is supposed to work:
At move 19 (or maybe 18 or 20), my opponent played Adela. The interface required my opponent to discard first. I then discarded the same card, putting my opponent at a disadvantage with what is already the worst King in the deck.
I assume the discard should be done first by the opponent(s) so that the person who played Adela can then decide which card to discard, and ensure that an actual action can be taken (in the event that the other player(s) discard a character that would have no effect for the person who played Adela. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
does not matter
Rapporthistorik
Actually, all players as in multiplayer state. I will change for all opponents and after a special state for the active player
It's technically not a bug since the player can only wait the others players to discard but in turn based game, it's not really interesting.
Thanks :)
Lägg till något till denna rapport
- Ett annat spelbords-ID / drag-ID
- Löste F5 problemet?
- Uppträdde problemet flera gånger? Varje gång? Slumpmässigt?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
