#17460: "Make it possible to undo placement of assistants"
Vad handlar denna rapport om?
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne
Om detta stämmer, RÖSTA på denna rapport. Rapporterna med flest röster har PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljerad beskrivning
-
• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
Currently the interface asks you to place assistants, and then once you confirm, it's impossible to take that decision back. But it is very easy to place assistants and, when you need to move your President, realize you made a mistake (e.g. failed to make a continuous path to your destination, or don't have money to go through Presidents/canal). It should be possible to go back to the assistant placement step--the current interface is too unforgiving for new players, and even can trip up experienced players who have 2nd thoughts or commit an oversight.
-
• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v81
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
Currently the interface asks you to place assistants, and then once you confirm, it's impossible to take that decision back. But it is very easy to place assistants and, when you need to move your President, realize you made a mistake (e.g. failed to make a continuous path to your destination, or don't have money to go through Presidents/canal). It should be possible to go back to the assistant placement step--the current interface is too unforgiving for new players, and even can trip up experienced players who have 2nd thoughts or commit an oversight.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v81
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Currently the interface asks you to place assistants, and then once you confirm, it's impossible to take that decision back. But it is very easy to place assistants and, when you need to move your President, realize you made a mistake (e.g. failed to make a continuous path to your destination, or don't have money to go through Presidents/canal). It should be possible to go back to the assistant placement step--the current interface is too unforgiving for new players, and even can trip up experienced players who have 2nd thoughts or commit an oversight.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v81
-
• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
Currently the interface asks you to place assistants, and then once you confirm, it's impossible to take that decision back. But it is very easy to place assistants and, when you need to move your President, realize you made a mistake (e.g. failed to make a continuous path to your destination, or don't have money to go through Presidents/canal). It should be possible to go back to the assistant placement step--the current interface is too unforgiving for new players, and even can trip up experienced players who have 2nd thoughts or commit an oversight.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v81
-
• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
Currently the interface asks you to place assistants, and then once you confirm, it's impossible to take that decision back. But it is very easy to place assistants and, when you need to move your President, realize you made a mistake (e.g. failed to make a continuous path to your destination, or don't have money to go through Presidents/canal). It should be possible to go back to the assistant placement step--the current interface is too unforgiving for new players, and even can trip up experienced players who have 2nd thoughts or commit an oversight.
-
• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v81
-
• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
Currently the interface asks you to place assistants, and then once you confirm, it's impossible to take that decision back. But it is very easy to place assistants and, when you need to move your President, realize you made a mistake (e.g. failed to make a continuous path to your destination, or don't have money to go through Presidents/canal). It should be possible to go back to the assistant placement step--the current interface is too unforgiving for new players, and even can trip up experienced players who have 2nd thoughts or commit an oversight.
-
• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
-
• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v81
-
• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
Currently the interface asks you to place assistants, and then once you confirm, it's impossible to take that decision back. But it is very easy to place assistants and, when you need to move your President, realize you made a mistake (e.g. failed to make a continuous path to your destination, or don't have money to go through Presidents/canal). It should be possible to go back to the assistant placement step--the current interface is too unforgiving for new players, and even can trip up experienced players who have 2nd thoughts or commit an oversight.
-
• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v81
-
• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Currently the interface asks you to place assistants, and then once you confirm, it's impossible to take that decision back. But it is very easy to place assistants and, when you need to move your President, realize you made a mistake (e.g. failed to make a continuous path to your destination, or don't have money to go through Presidents/canal). It should be possible to go back to the assistant placement step--the current interface is too unforgiving for new players, and even can trip up experienced players who have 2nd thoughts or commit an oversight.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v81
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
Currently the interface asks you to place assistants, and then once you confirm, it's impossible to take that decision back. But it is very easy to place assistants and, when you need to move your President, realize you made a mistake (e.g. failed to make a continuous path to your destination, or don't have money to go through Presidents/canal). It should be possible to go back to the assistant placement step--the current interface is too unforgiving for new players, and even can trip up experienced players who have 2nd thoughts or commit an oversight.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v81
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Currently the interface asks you to place assistants, and then once you confirm, it's impossible to take that decision back. But it is very easy to place assistants and, when you need to move your President, realize you made a mistake (e.g. failed to make a continuous path to your destination, or don't have money to go through Presidents/canal). It should be possible to go back to the assistant placement step--the current interface is too unforgiving for new players, and even can trip up experienced players who have 2nd thoughts or commit an oversight.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v81
Rapporthistorik
(Don't draw new order / technology cards unless the player has validated the turn.)
Very frustrating.
Different colors of buttons and icons could be helpful too, as well on others games.
Lägg till något till denna rapport
- Ett annat spelbords-ID / drag-ID
- Löste F5 problemet?
- Uppträdde problemet flera gånger? Varje gång? Slumpmässigt?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
