• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?

• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

The game allows assigning meeples to a building even though the player doesn't have enough coins to pay for the building's action. Which is OK by the rules - the meeple is put on the building, and the action is forfeit.
But the game should at least notify the player about this, and let them reconsider, because this is a very rare use case in the game. Maybe once in every 100 turns there will be a need to only block a building so that an opponent wouldn't have access to it. But the other 99 times the player would want to actually take the action.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?