• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?

• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

There are games where the starting player of a two-player game has some kind of advantage (e.g. in Carcassonne the first player gets to play one extra tile as the total number of the tiles in the pile is an odd number [71] in the base game) therefore it would be fair to take this into account when a new round of a swiss system or single elimination tournament starts: in every single game of the new round the starting player should be the player who played less games as starting player during the previous rounds of the tournament. (When there is no difference then it can be decided randomly.)

As for round robin tournaments, the number of how many times the players can start a game should be balanced as well.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?