#77164: "Defence Blocking Cost"
Vad handlar denna rapport om?
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne
Om detta stämmer, RÖSTA på denna rapport. Rapporterna med flest röster har PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljerad beskrivning
-
• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... -
• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... -
• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... -
• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
-
• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v107
-
• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... -
• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här.
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v107
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
It's not too bad on the spells, but with the monsters, the defence shield is over the cost so it's difficult to see what it originally cost, especially if the monster is depleted from the central pool.
Depending on how you've focused your symbols, e.g. maybe you have not many cards which use salt, it's important to know what that card would cost to replenish if you chose to take shields from that creature to defend, so if I know it costs salt in this example maybe I want to make sure to take shields from it first so I have better options if I roll salt however if it does NOT cost salt then maybe I want to take shields from a salt costing defence, or something similar... • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v107
Rapporthistorik
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Lägg till något till denna rapport
- Ett annat spelbords-ID / drag-ID
- Löste F5 problemet?
- Uppträdde problemet flera gånger? Varje gång? Slumpmässigt?
- Om du har en skärmdump av den här buggen (bra vana att ta en), så kan du använda en programvara (snipboard.io som till exempel) för att ladda upp bilden och klistra in länken här.
