• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.

I was only given 1 point for a win. This game takes way to long to only score one point for a win. Yes they were lower ranking players however to invest 30 to 45 minutes into a game and win and only get one point seems like a bit of a waste of time. I do love to play but i'm also motivated by getting to a ranking status quicker. In general I feel the scoring is off a little in lots of games. In azul once you get to a certain level and you play people the if you lose to a lower ranking player you drop dramatically and if you win you only score a tiny bit. Maybe there could be a way to choose the level of people that you are willing to play so you don't lose as many point or the risk reward is better. Thanks for the games they are way fun and that is what i really care about.

• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

I was only given 1 point for a win. This game takes way to long to only score one point for a win. Yes they were lower ranking players however to invest 30 to 45 minutes into a game and win and only get one point seems like a bit of a waste of time. I do love to play but i'm also motivated by getting to a ranking status quicker. In general I feel the scoring is off a little in lots of games. In azul once you get to a certain level and you play people the if you lose to a lower ranking player you drop dramatically and if you win you only score a tiny bit. Maybe there could be a way to choose the level of people that you are willing to play so you don't lose as many point or the risk reward is better. Thanks for the games they are way fun and that is what i really care about.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

I was only given 1 point for a win. This game takes way to long to only score one point for a win. Yes they were lower ranking players however to invest 30 to 45 minutes into a game and win and only get one point seems like a bit of a waste of time. I do love to play but i'm also motivated by getting to a ranking status quicker. In general I feel the scoring is off a little in lots of games. In azul once you get to a certain level and you play people the if you lose to a lower ranking player you drop dramatically and if you win you only score a tiny bit. Maybe there could be a way to choose the level of people that you are willing to play so you don't lose as many point or the risk reward is better. Thanks for the games they are way fun and that is what i really care about.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?

I was only given 1 point for a win. This game takes way to long to only score one point for a win. Yes they were lower ranking players however to invest 30 to 45 minutes into a game and win and only get one point seems like a bit of a waste of time. I do love to play but i'm also motivated by getting to a ranking status quicker. In general I feel the scoring is off a little in lots of games. In azul once you get to a certain level and you play people the if you lose to a lower ranking player you drop dramatically and if you win you only score a tiny bit. Maybe there could be a way to choose the level of people that you are willing to play so you don't lose as many point or the risk reward is better. Thanks for the games they are way fun and that is what i really care about.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?

I was only given 1 point for a win. This game takes way to long to only score one point for a win. Yes they were lower ranking players however to invest 30 to 45 minutes into a game and win and only get one point seems like a bit of a waste of time. I do love to play but i'm also motivated by getting to a ranking status quicker. In general I feel the scoring is off a little in lots of games. In azul once you get to a certain level and you play people the if you lose to a lower ranking player you drop dramatically and if you win you only score a tiny bit. Maybe there could be a way to choose the level of people that you are willing to play so you don't lose as many point or the risk reward is better. Thanks for the games they are way fun and that is what i really care about.

• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?

I was only given 1 point for a win. This game takes way to long to only score one point for a win. Yes they were lower ranking players however to invest 30 to 45 minutes into a game and win and only get one point seems like a bit of a waste of time. I do love to play but i'm also motivated by getting to a ranking status quicker. In general I feel the scoring is off a little in lots of games. In azul once you get to a certain level and you play people the if you lose to a lower ranking player you drop dramatically and if you win you only score a tiny bit. Maybe there could be a way to choose the level of people that you are willing to play so you don't lose as many point or the risk reward is better. Thanks for the games they are way fun and that is what i really care about.

• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?

• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?

I was only given 1 point for a win. This game takes way to long to only score one point for a win. Yes they were lower ranking players however to invest 30 to 45 minutes into a game and win and only get one point seems like a bit of a waste of time. I do love to play but i'm also motivated by getting to a ranking status quicker. In general I feel the scoring is off a little in lots of games. In azul once you get to a certain level and you play people the if you lose to a lower ranking player you drop dramatically and if you win you only score a tiny bit. Maybe there could be a way to choose the level of people that you are willing to play so you don't lose as many point or the risk reward is better. Thanks for the games they are way fun and that is what i really care about.

• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I was only given 1 point for a win. This game takes way to long to only score one point for a win. Yes they were lower ranking players however to invest 30 to 45 minutes into a game and win and only get one point seems like a bit of a waste of time. I do love to play but i'm also motivated by getting to a ranking status quicker. In general I feel the scoring is off a little in lots of games. In azul once you get to a certain level and you play people the if you lose to a lower ranking player you drop dramatically and if you win you only score a tiny bit. Maybe there could be a way to choose the level of people that you are willing to play so you don't lose as many point or the risk reward is better. Thanks for the games they are way fun and that is what i really care about.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

I was only given 1 point for a win. This game takes way to long to only score one point for a win. Yes they were lower ranking players however to invest 30 to 45 minutes into a game and win and only get one point seems like a bit of a waste of time. I do love to play but i'm also motivated by getting to a ranking status quicker. In general I feel the scoring is off a little in lots of games. In azul once you get to a certain level and you play people the if you lose to a lower ranking player you drop dramatically and if you win you only score a tiny bit. Maybe there could be a way to choose the level of people that you are willing to play so you don't lose as many point or the risk reward is better. Thanks for the games they are way fun and that is what i really care about.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

I was only given 1 point for a win. This game takes way to long to only score one point for a win. Yes they were lower ranking players however to invest 30 to 45 minutes into a game and win and only get one point seems like a bit of a waste of time. I do love to play but i'm also motivated by getting to a ranking status quicker. In general I feel the scoring is off a little in lots of games. In azul once you get to a certain level and you play people the if you lose to a lower ranking player you drop dramatically and if you win you only score a tiny bit. Maybe there could be a way to choose the level of people that you are willing to play so you don't lose as many point or the risk reward is better. Thanks for the games they are way fun and that is what i really care about.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?