#81590: "Lords Scoring incorrectly"
Vad handlar denna rapport om?
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne
Om detta stämmer, RÖSTA på denna rapport. Rapporterna med flest röster har PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljerad beskrivning
-
• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
Final - part of scoring.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
Final - part of scoring.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
Final - part of scoring.
-
• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v110
-
• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
-
• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
Final - part of scoring.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v110
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v110
Rapporthistorik
Lords scoring incorrect in two player game. One player had only majority of houses in two quadrants and 2nd in one quadrant - this should total 30 points but received 36 points.
The other player had correctly 36 points with majority in two quadrants and 2nd in two.
Lägg till något till denna rapport
- Ett annat spelbords-ID / drag-ID
- Löste F5 problemet?
- Uppträdde problemet flera gånger? Varje gång? Slumpmässigt?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
