• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av denna buggen (vilket är bra), så kan du använda Imgur.com för att ladda upp den och kopiera/klistra in länken här.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?

• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. Om du har en skärmdump av denna buggen (vilket är bra), så kan du använda Imgur.com för att ladda upp den och kopiera/klistra in länken här.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av denna buggen (vilket är bra), så kan du använda Imgur.com för att ladda upp den och kopiera/klistra in länken här.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?

• Vad har du för webbläsare?

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• Vad har du för webbläsare?