#95801: "Objective abundant not scored properly"
Vad handlar denna rapport om?
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne
Om detta stämmer, RÖSTA på denna rapport. Rapporterna med flest röster har PRIORITET!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Detaljerad beskrivning
• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
Still in game...• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v112
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av denna buggen (vilket är bra), så kan du använda Imgur.com för att ladda upp den och kopiera/klistra in länken här.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? Om den är det, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
Still in game...• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v112
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v112
• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v112
• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
Still in game...• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v112
• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
Still in game...• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v112
• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
Still in game...• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v112
• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. Om du har en skärmdump av denna buggen (vilket är bra), så kan du använda Imgur.com för att ladda upp den och kopiera/klistra in länken här.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v112
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av denna buggen (vilket är bra), så kan du använda Imgur.com för att ladda upp den och kopiera/klistra in länken här.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? Om den är det, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
Still in game...• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v112
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v112
Rapporthistorik
Move #51
Progression 86%
Opulent still works the old way - i.e. opponent sold a building but it still counted for Gold spent. Cost me the game!!
Thank you
Move #46
Progression 57%
Still counting sold buildings for the Opulent objective
Move #53
Progression 57%
Opulent Did work as intended. Which surprised us as it hadn't worked last game!!
Lägg till något till denna rapport
- Ett annat spelbords-ID / drag-ID
- Löste F5 problemet?
- Uppträdde problemet flera gånger? Varje gång? Slumpmässigt?
- Om du har en skärmdump av denna buggen (vilket är bra), så kan du använda Imgur.com för att ladda upp den och kopiera/klistra in länken här.