#9837: "When using the investigator, it sometimes gives false information. "
Vad handlar denna rapport om?
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan
Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne
Om detta stämmer, RÖSTA på denna rapport. Rapporterna med flest röster har PRIORITET!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detaljerad beskrivning
-
• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. -
• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v66
-
• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? I så fall, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Google Chrome v66
Rapporthistorik
I think I understand why it's making that mistake, nonetheless it's a serious bug and right now I am asking all of my opponents to verify my information as well as their own to prevent suffering from the glitch.
So, to improve the wording of the game log, I see two options:
1. "$player sent an investigator to $location. *New* matches: ...."
2. "$player sent an investigator to $location. Matches: $correctnumber"
If I go for 2., would it confuse players if it says, e.g. "matches: 1 exact, 1 adjacent" an then only 1 token appears on the investigator tile, because the other token is already on the aspect tile? Obviously moving the token from a tile to the investigator is not an option as this would reduce the amount information again (which doesn't make sense).
would be taken into consideration by the player holding the Case cards, making sure that a specific tile did not receive another disc or cube.“
So, if going by that, one could argue that the game log should as closely as possible imitate a real player, then the log should say something like: “Place 1 disc onto the investigator.”, really only talking about the new tokens.
“$player‘s investigator finds new information at $location: X disc(s), Y cube(s).”
#55
The answer is China Town, Knuckles, Bank job.
and I put my investigator on China Town square, which is neighbor of both Knuckles and Bank Job(there's a disc on Bank job). The right info should be "1 disc, 2 cubes", but it only shows "1 disc, 1 cube".
#77
The answer is Doc, Trocadero, Jewellery Heist
I put my investigator on the square below Jewellery Heist(already had a disc on it), which is not neighbor others, but this time I got a cube, indicated "Jewellery Heist".
"If you already have discs and/or cubes in the location then these would be taken into consideration by the player holding the Case cards, making sure that a specific tile did not receive another disc or cube."
On #40141874 #55
I already got a cube on that location and it's should be take into consideration, no duplicate info should given by investigator.
Is there a way to make it more visually obvious when this happens? Perhaps animate the cube moving from the location to the investigator then back to the location?
Lägg till något till denna rapport
- Ett annat spelbords-ID / drag-ID
- Löste F5 problemet?
- Uppträdde problemet flera gånger? Varje gång? Slumpmässigt?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
