#94314: ""One or Two Dutch" and "Extra Roles" Variant Setups"

• Var vänlig klipp och klistra in felmeddelandet du ser på skärmen, om något.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Varsågod och förklara vad du ville göra, vad du gjorde och vad som hände
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av denna buggen (vilket är bra), så kan du använda Imgur.com för att ladda upp den och kopiera/klistra in länken här.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? Om den är det, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5

• Vad visades på skärmen när du blockerades (Blank skärm? Del av spelets användargränssnitt? Felmeddelande?)?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5

• Vilken del av reglerna respekterades inte av BGA-adaptionen?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Är regelbrottet synligt i återuppspelning? Om ja, vilket nummer är det på draget?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5

• Vilken spelhandling ville du göra?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Vad försöker du göra för att sätta igång denna spelmekaniken?
• Vad hände när du försökte göra det här (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5

• På vilket steg i spelet kom felet (vad var den aktuella instruktionen från spelet)?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Vad hände när du försökte utföra en spelhandling (felmeddelande, meddelande i spelstatusrad, ...)?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5

• Vänligen beskriv visningsproblemet. Om du har en skärmdump av denna buggen (vilket är bra), så kan du använda Imgur.com för att ladda upp den och kopiera/klistra in länken här.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5

• Var vänlig kopiera/klistra in texten på engelska istället för ditt eget språk. Om du har en skärmdump av denna buggen (vilket är bra), så kan du använda Imgur.com för att ladda upp den och kopiera/klistra in länken här.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Är denna text tillgänglig i översättningssystemet? Om den är det, var det mer än 24 timmar sedan den översattes?
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5

• Vänligen förklara ditt förslag exakt och koncist så att det är så enkelt som möjligt att förstå vad du menar.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Vad har du för webbläsare?
Mozilla v5

Vad handlar denna rapport om?

Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan

Vad hände? Välj från alternativen nedan

Vänligen kontrollera om det redan finns en rapport om samma ämne

Detaljerad beskrivning

Rapporthistorik

Lägg till något till denna rapport

Ändra rapportstatus till:

Hjälp

Bidra

Följ oss